Taylor Swift Associates Pissed About Article Speculating on Her Sexuality

Taylor Swift turned the topic of a whole article making an attempt to determine if she was a part of the LGBTQ+ neighborhood … and apparently, folks in her world are fairly pissed about it.

The NYT just lately printed an op-ed by author Anna Marks — who identifies as queer — and it is titled, “Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do.” The whole premise of the piece is a deep dive into hypothesis that TS would possibly, maybe, be one thing apart from straight.

Marks refers to moments she perceives as Taylor “dropping hairpins” (aka, dropping clues about being LGBTQ+) all through her profession … writing, “In isolation, a single dropped hairpin is perhaps meaningless or accidental, but considered together, they’re the unfurling of a ballerina bun after a long performance.”

She provides, “Those dropped hairpins began to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry long before queer identity was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They suggest to queer people that she is one of us.” If it appears like a attain, Taylor’s camp appears to really feel the identical method.

Whereas Taylor has actually confirmed herself to be ally to the LGBTQ+ neighborhood, she’s by no means explicitly indicated she’s into something however dudes — in actual fact, her relationship document proves that.

That time was hit house by somebody near Taylor, who informed CNN … “Because of her massive success, in this moment there is a Taylor-shaped hole in people’s ethics. This article wouldn’t have been allowed to be written about Shawn Mendes or any male artist whose sexuality has been questioned by fans.”

This particular person provides, “There seems to be no boundary some journalists won’t cross when writing about Taylor, regardless of how invasive, untrue, and inappropriate it is — all under the protective veil of an ‘opinion piece.'”

There have, in actual fact, been assume items written about male pop stars and their sexuality … particularly, Harry Styles, Bad Bunny, and so on. However this level is effectively taken — simply go away it’s, folks.